Cataplexy response with extended-release once-nightly sodium oxybate: Post hoc responder analyses from the phase 3 REST-ON clinical trial.

Background: Once-nightly sodium oxybate (ON-SXB), an extended-release oxybate formulation, yielded significant (P < 0.001 at 6 g, 7.5 g, and 9 g) reductions in cataplexy episodes in participants in the phase 3 REST-ON clinical trial (NCT02720744). This post hoc analysis from REST-ON further characterized changes in cataplexy episodes in participants with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1). Methods: Participants with narcolepsy aged ≥16 years received ON-SXB (1 wk, 4.5 g; 2 wk, 6 g; 5 wk, 7.5 g; 5 wk, 9 g) or placebo. Percentages of participants with NT1 who had ≥25%, ≥50%, ≥75%, and 100% reductions from baseline in mean number of weekly cataplexy episodes were determined. Two-sided P values comparing ON-SXB vs placebo were calculated with Fisher exact test. Results: Participants with NT1 (ON-SXB, n = 73; placebo, n = 72; modified intent-to-treat population) had a baseline mean number of weekly cataplexy episodes of 18.9 (ON-SXB) and 19.8 (placebo). Of participants receiving the highest doses of ON-SXB (7.5 and 9 g), approximately half had a 50% reduction, one-third had a 75% reduction, and one-tenth had a 100% reduction in their cataplexy episodes vs placebo. Significantly greater proportions of participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo had respective reductions in weekly cataplexy episodes of ≥25% at weeks 1 (4.5 g; P < 0.05), 3 (6 g; P < 0.001), 8 (7.5 g; P < 0.001), and 13 (9 g; P = 0.001). Conclusions: A significantly greater proportion of participants receiving ON-SXB vs placebo experienced reductions in weekly cataplexy episodes at all tested doses. Approximately 10% of participants taking the 2 highest ON-SXB doses had complete elimination of their cataplexy.

The Combination of Aroxybutynin and Atomoxetine in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (MARIPOSA): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder for which the principal treatment option, continuous positive airway pressure, is often poorly tolerated. There is currently no approved pharmacotherapy for OSA. However, recent studies have demonstrated improvement in OSA with combined antimuscarinic and noradrenergic drugs. Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of AD109, a combination of the novel antimuscarinic agent aroxybutynin and the norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor atomoxetine, in the treatment of OSA. Methods: Phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 4-week trial comparing AD109 2.5/75 mg, AD109 5/75 mg, atomoxetine 75 mg alone, and placebo (www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05071612). Measurements and Main Results: Of 211 randomized patients, 181 were included in the prespecified efficacy analyses. Sleep was assessed by two baseline and two treatment polysomnograms. Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion (primary outcome) was reduced from a median (IQR) of 20.5 (12.3-27.2) to 10.8 (5.6-18.5) in the AD109 2.5/75 mg arm (-47.1%), from 19.4 (13.7-26.4) to 9.5 (6.1-19.3) in the AD109 5/75 mg arm (-42.9%; both P < 0.0001 vs. placebo), and from 19.0 (11.8-28.8) to 11.8 (5.5-21.5) with atomoxetine alone (-38.8%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo). Apnea-hypopnea index with a 4% desaturation criterion decreased from 20.1 (11.9-25.9) to 16.3 (11.1-28.9) in the placebo arm. Subjectively, there was improvement in fatigue with AD109 2.5/75 mg (P < 0.05 vs. placebo and atomoxetine). Atomoxetine taken alone decreased total sleep time (P < 0.05 vs. AD109 and placebo). The most common adverse events were dry mouth, insomnia, and urinary hesitancy. Conclusions: AD109 showed clinically meaningful improvement in OSA, suggesting that further development of the compound is warranted. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05071612).

Effects of atomoxetine plus a hypnotic on obstructive sleep apnea severity in patients with a moderately collapsible pharyngeal airway.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Pharmacotherapy for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) regained consideration after the discovery that atomoxetine and oxybutynin greatly reduced OSA severity. However, atomoxetine and oxybutynin reduced the arousal threshold and may therefore be poorly tolerated in patients with OSA and disturbed sleep. As a result, we tested the combination of atomoxetine plus 2 hypnotics in patients with OSA. The effects of atomoxetine plus: (1) trazodone (Ato-Trazo) and (2) lemborexant vs placebo on apnea-hypopnea index, hypoxic burden, arousal threshold, and total sleep time were assessed. Drug safety was also ascertained, together with the effect of the combinations on other OSA traits, self-reported sleep quality, and next-day alertness. METHODS: Following a baseline study, 15 patients with mild-to-severe OSA with moderate upper airway collapsibility were administered Ato-Trazo, atomoxetine and lemborexant, and matching placebo according to a double-blind, randomized, crossover design. Apnea-hypopnea index and other objective outcomes were calculated from 3 clinical, in-laboratory polysomnograms. RESULTS: Ato-Trazo significantly reduced apnea-hypopnea index from a median [interquartile range] of 18.2 [11.8 to 31.3] on placebo to 7.4 [5.4 to 16.1] events/h, P = .024, and hypoxic burden from 46.3 [25.1 to 88.3] on placebo to 18.7 [14.9 to 43.5], P = .003. This effect was likely driven by an increase in polysomnography-estimated pharyngeal muscle activity during the events (P = .029). Atomoxetine and lemborexant had smaller statistically insignificant effects. Contrary to atomoxetine and oxybutynin, Ato-Trazo and atomoxetine and lemborexant did not reduce the arousal threshold. Both combinations had no effect on total sleep time but worsened self-reported sleep quality. CONCLUSIONS: Ato-Trazo has the potential to become a useful drug combination, however, longer trials are needed to determine the best dosage and the subgroup of patients who may benefit most from this combination. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Crossover Trial of AD182 and AD504 in Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04645524; Identifier: NCT04645524. CITATION: Corser B, Eves E, Warren-McCormick J, Rucosky G. Effects of atomoxetine plus a hypnotic on obstructive sleep apnea severity in patients with a moderately collapsible pharyngeal airway. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(6):1035-1042.

Effect of FT218, a Once-Nightly Sodium Oxybate Formulation, on Disrupted Nighttime Sleep in Patients with Narcolepsy: Results from the Randomized Phase III REST-ON Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sodium oxybate has been recognized as a gold standard for the treatment of disrupted nighttime sleep due to narcolepsy. Its short half-life and immediate-release formulation require patients to awaken 2.5-4 h after their bedtime dose to take a second dose. A novel extended-release, once-nightly sodium oxybate formulation (ON-SXB; FT218) is under US Food and Drug Administration review for the treatment of adults with narcolepsy. OBJECTIVE: A phase III trial of ON-SXB in individuals with narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) or 2 (NT2) [the REST-ON trial; NCT02720744] has been conducted and the primary results reported elsewhere. Secondary objectives from REST-ON were to assess the efficacy of ON-SXB on disrupted nighttime sleep; the results of this analysis are reported here. METHODS: In the double-blind, phase III REST-ON trial, patients aged ≥ 16 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to ON-SXB (1 week, 4.5 g; 2 weeks, 6 g; 5 weeks, 7.5 g; 5 weeks, 9 g) or placebo. Secondary endpoints included polysomnographic measures of sleep stage shifts and nocturnal arousals and patient-reported assessments of sleep quality and refreshing nature of sleep at 6, 7.5, and 9 g; post hoc analyses included changes in time spent in each sleep stage, delta power, and assessments in stimulant-use subgroups for prespecified endpoints. RESULTS: In total, 190 participants (n = 97, ON-SXB; n = 93, placebo) were included in the efficacy analyses. All three ON-SXB doses demonstrated a clinically meaningful, statistically significant decrease vs placebo in the number of transitions to wake/N1 from N1, N2, and rapid eye movement (REM) stages (all doses p < 0.001) and the number of nocturnal arousals (p < 0.05 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.001 7.5 and 9 g). Sleep quality and refreshing nature of sleep were significantly improved with all three ON-SXB doses vs placebo (p < 0.001). Post hoc analyses revealed a significant reduction in time spent in N1 (p < 0.05 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.001 7.5 and 9 g) and REM (all p < 0.001) and increased time spent in N3 with ON-SXB vs placebo (all p < 0.001), with a significant increase in delta power (p < 0.01 ON-SXB 6 g; p < 0.05 7.5 g; p < 0.001 9 g) and increased REM latency (ON-SXB 7.5 g vs placebo; p < 0.05). Significant improvements in disrupted nighttime sleep were observed regardless of concomitant stimulant use. CONCLUSIONS: The clinically beneficial, single nighttime dose of ON-SXB significantly improved disrupted nighttime sleep in patients with narcolepsy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02720744.

Preferences for Attributes of Sodium Oxybate Treatment: A Discrete Choice Experiment in Patients with Narcolepsy.

Purpose: Current US FDA-approved treatments for narcolepsy include sodium oxybate (SXB) and calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium oxybates (mixed-salt oxybates), which require 2 nightly doses, 1 at bedtime and another 2.5 to 4 hours later. Once-nightly SXB (ON-SXB; FT218) is under FDA review to treat adults with narcolepsy. This study quantitatively characterized attributes of SXB treatment preferred by individuals with narcolepsy via a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and evaluated preferences for the product profiles of once-nightly vs twice-nightly SXB treatment. Patients and Methods: Adults with self-reported physician-diagnosed narcolepsy for ≥1 year and current or prior twice-nightly SXB treatment were eligible for this 30-minute, web-based study capturing patient experiences and a DCE. Participants responded to a survey instrument using 9-point scales; higher scores indicated greater severity/preference/satisfaction. In the DCE, hundreds of profiles were generated, each combining attributes of twice-nightly SXB and ON-SXB based on clinical trial data. The DCE was analyzed using a hierarchical Bayesian model. Results: Seventy-five participants were surveyed (50 current and 25 past twice-nightly SXB users). Dosing frequency was the most important attribute of SXB treatment; once nightly was significantly preferred vs twice nightly. The most common reasons for overall product preference were lack of need to wake up in the middle of the night for a second dose (48%), fewer side effects (46%), and ease of administration (32%). Number of nightly doses was the most important driver of taking the medication exactly as directed and reduced anxiety/stress. Participants were significantly more likely to prefer the blinded product profile of once-nightly SXB over twice-nightly SXB (mean rating, 7.5 vs 4.3; P<0.05). Conclusion: Among the choices presented, dosing frequency was the most important attribute for overall product choice, likelihood to take medication exactly as directed, and reducing anxiety/stress. The ON-SXB blinded profile was significantly preferred over twice-nightly SXB.

Once-nightly sodium oxybate (FT218) demonstrated improvement of symptoms in a phase 3 randomized clinical trial in patients with narcolepsy.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy and safety of FT218, a novel once-nightly formulation of sodium oxybate (ON-SXB), in patients with narcolepsy in the phase 3 REST-ON trial. METHODS: Narcolepsy patients aged ≥16 years were randomized 1:1 to uptitration of ON-SXB (4.5, 6, 7.5, and 9 g) or placebo. Three coprimary endpoints were change from baseline in mean sleep latency on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test, Clinical Global Impression-Improvement rating, and weekly cataplexy attacks at 9, 7.5, and 6 g. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Safety included adverse drug reactions and clinical laboratory assessments. RESULTS: In total, 222 patients were randomized; 212 received ≥1 dose of ON-SXB (n = 107) or placebo (n = 105). For the three coprimary endpoints and Epworth Sleepiness Scale, all three doses of ON-SXB demonstrated clinically meaningful, statistically significant improvement versus placebo (all p < 0.001). For ON-SXB 9 g versus placebo, increase in mean sleep latency was 10.8 versus 4.7 min (Least squares mean difference, LSMD [95% CI], 6.13 [3.52 to 8.75]), 72.0% versus 31.6% were rated much/very much improved on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (OR [95% CI], 5.56 [2.76 to 11.23]), change in mean weekly number of cataplexy attacks was -11.5 versus -4.9 (LSMD [95% CI], -6.65 [-9.32 to -3.98]), and change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale was -6.5 and -2.7 (LSMD [95% CI], -6.52 [-5.47 to -2.26]). Common adverse reactions included nausea, vomiting, headache, dizziness, and enuresis. CONCLUSIONS: ON-SXB significantly improved narcolepsy symptoms; its safety profile was consistent with SXB. ON-SXB conferred efficacy with a clearly beneficial single nighttime dose. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02720744, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02720744.

A randomized study of solriamfetol for excessive sleepiness in narcolepsy.

OBJECTIVE: Solriamfetol (JZP-110) is a selective dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor with wake-promoting effects. This phase 3 study (NCT02348593) evaluated the safety and efficacy of solriamfetol in narcolepsy. METHODS: Patients with narcolepsy with mean sleep latency <25 minutes on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score ≥10, and usual nightly sleep ≥6 hours were randomized to solriamfetol 75, 150, or 300 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks. Coprimary endpoints were change from baseline to week 12 in MWT and ESS. Improvement on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) was the key secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Safety and modified intention-to-treat populations included 236 and 231 patients, respectively. Solriamfetol 300 and 150 mg were positive on both coprimary endpoints. Least squares mean (standard error [SE]) changes from baseline were 12.3 (SE = 1.4) and 9.8 (SE = 1.3) minutes for solriamfetol 300 and 150 mg on the MWT, respectively, versus 2.1 (SE = 1.3) minutes for placebo, and -6.4 (SE = 0.7) for 300 mg and -5.4 (SE = 0.7) for 150 mg on the ESS versus -1.6 (SE = 0.7) for placebo (all p < 0.0001). At week 12, higher percentages of patients treated with solriamfetol 150 mg (78.2%) and 300 mg (84.7%) reported PGI-C improvement relative to placebo (39.7%; both p < 0.0001). Adverse events ≥5% across all solriamfetol doses included headache (21.5%), nausea (10.7%), decreased appetite (10.7%), nasopharyngitis (9.0%), dry mouth (7.3%), and anxiety (5.1%). INTERPRETATION: Solriamfetol has the potential to be an important therapeutic option for the treatment of impaired wakefulness and excessive sleepiness in patients with narcolepsy. ANN NEUROL 2019;85:359-370.

Effect of gaboxadol on sleep in adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia: results from two randomized, placebo-controlled, 30-night polysomnography studies.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of gaboxadol in the treatment of adult and elderly patients with primary insomnia. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, 30-night, polysomnography studies. SETTING: Sleep laboratory. PATIENTS: Primary insomnia, 18-64 y (adult study), or > or =65 y (elderly study). INTERVENTIONS: Adult study: gaboxadol 15 mg (GBX15; N = 148), 10 mg (GBX10; N = 154), or placebo (N = 156); elderly study: GBX10 (N = 157), gaboxadol 5 mg (GBX5; N = 153), or placebo (N=176). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Primary endpoints were wake after sleep onset (WASO) and latency to persistent sleep (LPS). Slow wave sleep (SWS) was a secondary endpoint. Analyses were based on the change from baseline for the average of nights 1/2, and nights 29/30, and compared gaboxadol versus placebo. Exploratory endpoints included patient's subjective assessment of total sleep time (sTST), WASO (sWASO), time to sleep onset (sTSO), and number of awakenings (sNAW); these analyses were based on weekly means. 1) Adult study. GBX15 significantly (P < or = 0.05) improved WASO through nights 29/30 but had no significant effects on LPS. No significant differences were seen for GBX10 versus placebo on WASO or LPS. GBX15 and GBX10 enhanced SWS. GBX15 significantly improved sTST, sWASO, sTSO, and sNAW at weeks 1 and 4. 2) Elderly study. GBX10 significantly improved WASO through nights 29/30; a significant improvement was also seen for GBX5 at nights 1/2 but this was not maintained through nights 29/30. GBX10 significantly improved LPS at nights 1/2 but the improvement was not maintained through nights 29/30; no significant differences were seen for GBX5 versus placebo on LPS. GBX10 and GBX5 enhanced SWS. GBX10 significantly improved sTST at week 1, and sTST, sWASO, and sNAW at week 4. Gaboxadol was generally well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum studied doses of gaboxadol (GBX15 in adult patients and GBX10 in elderly patients) were effective at enhancing objective polysomnography measures of sleep maintenance and SWS, and also some subjective sleep measures, over 30 nights but had little or no effects on sleep onset. The clinical relevance of the enhancement of SWS by gaboxadol is unclear.

Daytime pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic evaluation of low-dose sublingual transmucosal zolpidem hemitartrate.

OBJECTIVES: Buffered low-dose sublingual transmucosal zolpidem lozenge hemitartrate (ST zolpidem) is being developed for the treatment of middle-of-the-night insomnia. The objective of this double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over study (n = 24) was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and daytime-sedative profile of 1.0, 1.75, and 3.5 mg dose of the formulation. METHODS: Daytime sedation was measured pre-dose and up to 5 h post-dose objectively by the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and subjectively using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Blood samples for PK assessment was collected pre-dose and up to 12 h post-dose. RESULTS: The 1.75 and 3.5 mg, but not the 1 mg, ST zolpidem produced significant sedation versus placebo within 20 min of dosing which lasted for up to 3 h. Zolpidem from the formulation was rapidly absorbed and reached maximum plasma concentrations within 38 min of dosing, however the half-life was independent of the dose and side effects were consistent with the known pharmacology of the drug. CONCLUSIONS: ST zolpidem produced rapid, short duration of sedation and the effect was consistent with its PK profile. This novel low-dose formulation of zolpidem may provide clinicians and patients with a prn option for the management of sleep maintenance insomnia.

Efficacy and safety of doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg in adults with primary insomnia.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of doxepin 1, 3, and 6 mg in insomnia patients. DESIGN: Adults (18-64 y) with chronic primary insomnia (DSM-IV) were randomly assigned to one of four sequences of 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg of doxepin, and placebo in a crossover study. Treatment periods consisted of 2 polysomnographic assessment nights with a 5-day or 12-day drug-free interval between periods. Efficacy was assessed using polysomnography (PSG) and patient-reported measures. Safety analyses included measures of residual sedation and adverse events. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients were randomized. Wake time during sleep, the a priori defined primary endpoint, was statistically significantly improved at the doxepin 3 mg and 6 mg doses versus placebo. All three doses had statistically significant improvements versus placebo for PSG-defined wake after sleep onset, total sleep time, and overall sleep efficiency (SE). SE in the final third-of-the-night also demonstrated statistically significant improvement at all doses. The doxepin 6 mg dose significantly reduced subjective latency to sleep onset. All three doxepin doses had a safety profile comparable to placebo. There were no statistically significant differences in next-day residual sedation, and sleep architecture was generally clinically preserved. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with primary insomnia, doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg was well-tolerated and produced improvement in objective and subjective sleep maintenance and duration endpoints that persisted into the final hour of the night. The side-effect profile was comparable to placebo, with no reported anticholinergic effects, no memory impairment, and no significant hangover/next-day residual effects. These data demonstrate that doxepin 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg is efficacious in improving the sleep of patients with chronic primary insomnia.

A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of Tramadol Contramid OAD versus placebo in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis.

One thousand twenty-eight (1,028) patients with pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee were enrolled in this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel study designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Contramid OAD compared to placebo. An open-label phase was followed by a double-blind phase, in which a total of 646 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo or Tramadol Contramid OAD. Patients were titrated to their optimal dose (200mg or 300 mg), which was maintained for 12 weeks. An absolute mean reduction of 3.0+/-2.1 on a Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) was noted in the Tramadol Contramid OAD treatment group. The difference between active and placebo groups regarding this absolute mean reduction was statistically significant (P<0.001) throughout the study. The responder analysis demonstrated that a significantly greater percentage of patients in the active treatment arm achieved a reduction of >or=1 and >or=2 points on the PI-NRS score by the end of the study (P=0.035). A significantly greater percentage of respondents in the Tramadol Contramid OAD group indicated improvement on both the Patient and Physician Global Impressions of Change (P=0.0002). Both the 200mg and 300 mg doses contributed to the overall superiority of Tramadol Contramid OAD. The most frequent adverse events were consistent with the known side effects of tramadol and were generally mild to moderate in intensity. These results confirm that Tramadol Contramid OAD given once daily is an efficacious and safe treatment for pain due to OA.

Sleep and residual sedation after administration of zaleplon, zolpidem, and placebo during experimental middle-of-the-night awakening.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of zaleplon 10 mg and zolpidem 10 mg administered during experimental middle-of-the-night awakenings in patients with sleep-maintenance insomnia using objective polysomnographic measures and to assess daytime residual sedation 4 to 7 hours after dosing using sleep-latency testing. DESIGN: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-period, crossover design was used to study 37 adults with insomnia who received treatment during an experimental awakening 4 hours after bedtime. Latency to persistent sleep and total sleep time before and after awakening were recorded. The primary residual sedation measure was a sleep latency test conducted hourly from 4 to 7 hours after treatment. Self-report measure of alertness and concentration and digit symbol substitution tests were examined concurrently. SETTING: Sleep disorders centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-seven adults with sleep-maintenance insomnia. INTERVENTIONS: Zaleplon 10 mg, zolpidem 10 mg, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had efficacy-evaluable data; 37 patients received at least 1 dose of study medication and were included in the safety analysis. Compared with placebo, latency to persistent sleep after both zaleplon and zolpidem was shorter and total sleep time after administration of the drugs was longer (overall p < .001, Dunnett p < .001 for all posthoc comparisons). Significant differences from placebo were not found with zaleplon in daytime-sedation measures. At 4, 5, and 7 hours after zolpidem, sleep onset on sleep latency testing was shorter than after placebo (overall p < .001 for all, Dunnett tests for posthoc comparisons p < .001, p < .001, p < .05, respectively). Self-report measures of concentration (4, 5, and 6 hours, overall p < .05, Dunnett p < .05 for each time point) and alertness (4 hours, overall p < .05, Dunnett p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test scores (4 and 5 hours, overall p < .001, Dunnett p < .01 for both time points) after zolpidem were also lower than with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Zaleplon 10 mg and zolpidem 10 mg effectively shorten sleep latency and lengthen sleep duration after dosing, when administered during experimental nocturnal awakening. Residual sedation was not detected as little as 4 hours after zaleplon 10 mg, whereas residual sedation was detected with zolpidem 10 mg up to 7 hours after treatment. These findings suggest that zaleplon may be an appropriate treatment for use when patients awaken during the night and have difficulty reinitiating sleep.